I'm not disagreeing with you. I use the series feature all of the time and would find this feature to be helpful!
However it is still additional code/functionality that would need to be added as Ben mentioned in the comments above:
This was originally considered in the model, and then never really implemented. I'm not sure it needs to because the simplicity of chronological-only probably has value.
Because of this it would still need to go through our RFC (Request for comments) process.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
I'm not disagreeing with you. I use the series feature all of the time and would find this feature to be helpful!
However it is still additional code/functionality that would need to be added as Ben mentioned in the comments above:
This was originally considered in the model, and then never really implemented. I'm not sure it needs to because the simplicity of chronological-only probably has value.
Because of this it would still need to go through our RFC (Request for comments) process.