I totally agree with the original approaches mentioned in the issue, namely:
Make article's slug configurable apart from its title
Accept article's slug in %-encoded Unicode characters
I think that we better have both.
For implementation details, some users might prefer their letters converted into Roman alphabet, where other dislike it (reliability of automatic alphabetic transliteration varies a lot across languages). So, while we should allow users to customize their slug, we can set an ASCII transcriber defaulted for limited languages, such as this. (Note: This sentence assumes that the author can designate the language of a post. Transliteration purely based on script without language information would be even less ideal.)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
I totally agree with the original approaches mentioned in the issue, namely:
I think that we better have both.
For implementation details, some users might prefer their letters converted into Roman alphabet, where other dislike it (reliability of automatic alphabetic transliteration varies a lot across languages). So, while we should allow users to customize their slug, we can set an ASCII transcriber defaulted for limited languages, such as this. (Note: This sentence assumes that the author can designate the language of a post. Transliteration purely based on script without language information would be even less ideal.)